Frankly, anything that drives websites and webmasters to build more original content and to build quality links/sites is a good thing. I guess the hard part is how can we trust Google has figured out how to evaluate ‘quality content’? Su philippines whatsapp group re, there’s blatantly BAD content that’s created to ‘trick’ the system into giving it good search rankings. But isn’t there also original content that isn’t optimized, that may appear bad, but is actually really good? Do you trust Google to be able to make that decision for you?
Just read the Business 2 Community blog by Melissa Agnes – Starbuck’s Lesson: A Social Media Attack Can Arise When Least Expected – and it highlights a social media marketing lesson that everyone who uses social media should understand clearly:
“When it comes to communicating with your customers and fans on social media, truth, transparency and timely updates are always the best strategies to take. You have to remember that you can never please everyone, and social media attacks may arise when least expected.”
In this particular case, Starbuck’s did, in fact, play by the transparency rules that social media dictates and yet they still became the focus of a backlash. They probably could have been a little more careful positioning Argentinian-made backup products, especially to an Argentinian audience, but their intentions were good.
